The
Idaho State Historical Society has confirmed our date of Saturday, July 14, for the celebration of the Julian and Ina Dobson Homestead. Save the date. Everyone
is invited. We’re calling it “An Afternoon at the Old Dobson Place.” At least,
that’s what we’re calling it today.
Meanwhile,
I have been working to establish proof that Julian and Ina settled on the home place
prior to 1904 when the patent was issued. It’s clear that they had to have been
there earlier than 1904 in order to meet the criteria for the patent
application, but in order to establish an earlier date, I have to provide documentation or else the date on the “century farm” sign will be 1904. I hated to accept
that date unless I had to. After all, my dad was born on the homestead in 1904,
not to mention that Aunt Ethel was born there in 1897. So, I wrote the National
Archives, paid the required $40, and received a packet that included Julian’s land
patent application.
The
homestead application establishing Julian’s claim to the land is dated September
7, 1898, and stipulates the following:
“It is required of the homestead settler that he shall reside upon and
cultivate the land embraced in his homestead entry for a period of five years
from the time of filing the affidavit, being also the date of entry. An
abandonment of the land for more than six months works in forfeiture of the
claim. Further, within two years from the expiration of the said five years, he
must file proof of his actual settlement and cultivation, failing to do which,
his entry will be canceled.”
Then,
in bigger print that can’t be missed, the applicant is advised that “Final
proof must be made within seven years from date of this receipt, and payment
made . . .” I had to laugh. Human nature in 1898 was the same as human nature
today. They might have added, “so don’t tell us you didn’t know. . .”
That
homestead application was the initial step and specified the conditions Julian
had to meet. Then, five years later, on November 18, 1903, he took the next
step in the process. “I, Julian Dobson,” reads the document, “do hereby give
notice of my intention to make final proof to establish my claim to the land
above described and that I expect to prove my residence and cultivation before the
clerk of district court at Orofino, Idaho, on January 14, 1904. . .”
The
above notice was then published in the Peck Press printed at Peck, Idaho, such
publication being a necessary part of the process. A copy of this notice is
included in the packet.
On
the “Homestead Proof – Testimony of Claimant,” Julian specifies the
improvements:
·
Built
log house Nov. 14, 1896, and established residence at once.
·
Frame
and log house 18x24
·
Chicken
house 10x12
·
About
120 acres fenced and cross fenced
·
Two
acres orchard
·
60
acres broken
·
Well
and cistern
·
Improvements
are worth $800
He
has a wife and four children, he says (and doesn’t add that another is on the
way) and residence has been continuous.
He
states he has raised seven crops and provides a history as follows:
·
20
acres in 1897
·
35
acres in 1898
·
40
acres in 1899
·
45acres
1900
·
50
acres 1901
·
60
acres 1902 and 1903
With
regard to the character of the land, Julian states: “Forty acres timbered
agricultural land and rest of it is prairie. Most value for farming and grazing.”
Included
with this “testimony of claimant,” are the testimonies of two witnesses, John
Chandler and William Cunningham. Mr. Chandler, 72 years of age, says he doesn’t
know when Julian made settlement because he was living on the land when he [Chandler]
came into the vicinity in April 1897. He states that Julian has a house, barn,
chicken house, granary, and hog house, the size of which he doesn’t know, but
they are as good as the ordinary buildings in the locality. Mr. Cunningham’s
comments are much the same, though he provides that Julian established
residence in the early part of 1896.
So
there it is – documentation – and it is just as Ina has said. KW
[Photo 1: Bean harvest on the Julian Dobson homestead, 1897. No machinery was used at this time -- the beans were pulled by hand and later threshed on the barn floor with flails. Left to right: Ross Pratt, June Dobson, Julian Dobson, Frank Dickson, Perry Chandler, Charley Boehm (boy), John Boehm, Clarence Chandler, Marshall Brooks.
Photo 2: The residence of Mrs. Ina Dobson. Ina is in the foreground with her four children: Myrtle, Ethel, Pearl, and Irl. Sitting on the lumber is Ida Chandler Dickson, Ina's sister-in-law. Julian Dobson is standing to the right. The cabin was built in November 1896. The kitchen, which is unfinished in both of these pictures, was added in 1901.
Photo 3: As the kitchen is still unfinished, the year must still be 1901. Ina stands in the yard with her children.]
10 comments:
Yay!! And you got it in time. Amazing what is in our National Archives--well worth your $40.
Yes, it was well worth the $40. And it came in two weeks, well short of the specified 60 to 90 days.
Question: did you have to know the land description or just the homesteader's name? Dad was talking about his grandparents homesteading up out of Orofino toward Grangemont in about the same time frame and he'd like to know where it was.
What a wonderful story. The details of the land improvements are very interesting. So glad you made a request to the National Archives for the records.
Good job, Kathy.
Yes, Chris, I provided the legal description of the land, and I think that was required. Someplace you should be able to find basic info. The courthouse comes to mind, but I've done very little of that kind of research. My dad left a pretty good paper trail. The only documentation we had to find was that the farm was transferred to Ina after Julian died. We found that at the courthouse.
It is interesting info, though, if you can find the legal description.
Very cool! I like the second photo. I didn't notice at fist that the little one is SITTING on a dog! As you have probably noticed, I like scrutinizing the photos. The more I look, the more I see. Ina has already planted a rose bush next to the house. She was probably very good at making a comfortable home no matter how modest.
Good eye Sherlock.
I wondered if the rose bush is a really a lilac. There was a beautiful lilac bush beside the old cabin. The shape does suggest a rose. Ina loved the wild roses, so it might be a rose.
Julian and Ina were so happy to have their own place, but I feel quite certain that Ina cherished the dream of exchanging the rough cabin for a better house.
The home-based standards of that day were quite noble. Ina believed in home, family, and farm life. She had her Bible, of course, and her volume of "Happy Homes and the Hearts that Make Them," by Samuel Smiles. I'm sure she took inspiration from these.
Boy, you've got sharp eyes, Hallie. After reading the comments I had to go back and look and I do believe you're right about the dog/bench.
Post a Comment