My
mother used to say that she and my dad had more fun doing something casual like
making a trip to the dump together than any other sort of “date.” I thought of
that today when Mike invited me to accompany him to the landfill in the old
beater truck.
The
old beater truck – a 1972 Dodge Ram – has deteriorated to the point of being
marginally safe. A couple of years ago when Hallie was trying to arrange
transportation to a rafting event, I heard her ask Mike if the old truck was
safe to drive. “Barely,” was his response. Hmmmm. If you don’t think your
daughter ought to drive it, then maybe you shouldn’t either.
But
we use it so seldom. We use it to haul the occasional large item to the farm. We
throw our town yard waste into it and when it’s full we make a trip to the
landfill. Sometimes a friend borrows it for the same purpose. And we use it to
get wood. So today, we had to empty it of yard waste so that tomorrow Mike and
Ken can get wood. I’m not quite sure why I was invited along. Moral support? To
pay the fee? Just for the fun of it?
Anyway,
there I was at the landfill watching Mike rake the debris out of the pick-up
bed, and there on the ground, lying in the dirt, was a Simplicity dress
pattern. One of my favorite online searches is for vintage patterns – some old
and some not so old -- so I didn’t know anyone still threw them away. I thought
to myself that where there’s one, there’s apt to be more. I remember how my
mother threw away her used patterns -- not one at a time but in bulk when the
pattern drawer was full, so I would expect a sewist to throw away more than one
pattern. Indeed, I did find one more in the dirt and a copy of Victorian
magazine. I picked these things up from the approach – not by scavenging
through the trash. Still – I could hear Chris asking in her teacher voice,
“Where are your gloves?”
I
had to ask myself what I thought I was doing. These patterns were published in
’96 and ’97. Would I have bought them then? Would I buy them today? Probably
not. Can I afford brand new patterns at Jo-Ann Fabrics? Absolutely. But that
doesn’t matter. I consider myself a collector and it seemed like a windfall. I
came home with those patterns.
I
just knew that somewhere in the mound before me could likely be found a
treasure trove of used patterns just ripe for the taking. But – the landfill
does have a rule against scavenging, and I also have my pride -- don’t I?
The
envelopes were rather dirty, so I photocopied them, threw the originals away,
and placed the contents in plastic bags for storage. ZipLoc bags work well. Despite
a torn and dirty exterior, I discovered the Simplicity pattern was unused –
still in factory folds.
As
the old saying goes: “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure.” KW
3 comments:
You heard my voice? At least I was giving good advice. Did it also say they should have recycled instead of dumped? :-) That said, the patterns you got are cute and the magazine looks interesting. Good idea to photocopy the envelopes and then throw them away. Of course, you probably lost $1000 by doing so. (At least that's what they say about Barbies, etc., not in the original box... LOL!!)
Yes -- remember you asked me where my gloves were when I posted about trash pick-up. I hear your voice in your comments, whether you speak them or not.
Speaking of recycling, I couldn't believe all the recyclable cardboard there in the landfill. The patterns were the least of it.
I know all about that pristine in the box thing. It has yet to bless me. I'm convinced the soiled envelopes had already lost their value.
Oh that's right--I do remember saying you needed gloves on the trash pick-up detail.
Yeah, I don't worry about making money on "collectibles". I buy things to use or enjoy, not to become rich in the distant future. :-)
Post a Comment